Home Contact Us

We are the only NZ Police oversight body

We are not part of the NZ Police

Under law we are fully independent

If you have a complaint about the NZ Police, you can come to us

Mana Whanonga Pirihimana Motuhake

Home / Publications and Media / 2016 Media Releases

Police actions during a pursuit in South Auckland

22 November 2016

The Independent Police Conduct Authority has found that two officers repeatedly disregarded both Police fleeing driver policy and the directions of the pursuit controller during a 20 minute pursuit in South Auckland on 13 August 2015.

At about 7.40pm, Police commenced a pursuit of a stolen Mazda containing three young people who were suspects in a series of recent crimes. On several occasions the 16-year-old driver drove on the wrong side of the road, including on the motorway. The driver also turned off the Mazda’s headlights.

Due to the risks involved, Police abandoned the pursuit multiple times. However some officers continued to follow the Mazda. Road spikes were correctly used on three occasions to deflate the vehicle’s tyres. The pursuit came to an end when the Mazda was stopped on the motorway and the driver was arrested.

Authority Chair, Judge Sir David Carruthers said: “This pursuit included many of the high-risk factors which have led other pursuits to end in tragedy.

“The two officers knew that a young person was behind the wheel and was driving in an increasingly dangerous manner on public roads to try to avoid apprehension. In addition, it was dark, the Mazda had a punctured tyre and there were other young people in the car. Despite this, the two officers did not comply with the fleeing driver policy. They should have abandoned the pursuit earlier than they did, and they should not have recommenced the pursuit after they had abandoned it. They also disregarded the pursuit controller’s explicit instruction not to re-engage.

Their actions amounted to a significant departure from the fleeing driver policy and also compromised the pursuit controller’s ability to control the pursuit” said Sir David.

The pursuit controller attempted to control the pursuit, but was hampered by an incomplete understanding of the context of the pursuit, the identity of the offender and the actions of the two officers. “Regardless, it was clear towards the end of the pursuit that the two officers were not complying with directions and the pursuit controller should have demonstrated more proactive and assertive command and control.” said Sir David.

Following this incident, Police conducted an employment investigation into the actions of the key officers involved.

Public Report

Police actions during a pursuit in South Auckland (PDF 609 KB)

MoST Content Management V3.0.8634